Текст бизнес-книги "Russian business law: the essentials"

Автор книги: Evgeny Gubin

Раздел: О бизнесе популярно, Бизнес-книги

Currently in the Russian legislation peasant (farmer) economy refers to:

i) the association of citizens (the citizens can conclude an agreement on the establishment of a peasant (farmer) economy, and carry out joint entrepreneurial activities without the formation of a legal entity),

ii) a legal entity.

The Federal Law on Peasant (Farmer) Economies determines a peasant (farmer) economy (or simply “farming”) solely as an association of citizens, and not as a legal entity. In accordance with Clause 1 of Article 1 of the aforementioned law, a peasant (farmer) economy includes “the citizens bound by the alliance and/or property, having property goods in common and jointly performing production and other economic activities (production, conversion, storage, transportation and implementation of agricultural products), based on their personal participation.” At the same time, the norms intended for the profit organizations are applied to the peasant economy, without the formation of a legal entity.

In accordance with Article 6 of the Federal Law on Peasant (Farmer) Economies, the property of the peasant economy may include a land plot, farm improvements, ameliorative and other constructions, productive and working cattle, birds, agricultural and other machinery and the equipment, vehicles, stock, and other property, necessary for the implementation of the economy’s activities. The property of the economy belongs to its members on the right of joint ownership, unless otherwise provided by an agreement between them. The shares of the economy’s members, in terms of share property, are established by an agreement between the economy members. Fruits, production, and incomes gained by the economy as a result of its property's use are considered as common property of all members.

The CC of the RF establishes that the persons who have concluded an economy founding agreement have the right to create a legal entity. The property of such an economy is determined by the right to ownership. Members bear a subsidiary liability for the obligations of the economy.

The peasant economy is a highly unpopular form of entrepreneurial activities in Russia, due to the personal liability of its participants and undeveloped legislation.

An industrial cooperative is a legal entity created by its participants, for joint industrial and other economic activities, based on their personal labor and other participation. The participants of industrial cooperatives contribute shares to the organization's property. The number of participants cannot be less than five.

The profits of the industrial cooperative are divided among its participants based on the labor participation of each of them in the activities of the organization. The law and the charter can provide another order for profit division. Industrial cooperative members bear subsidiary liability for the obligations of the cooperative, in accordance with the Federal Law on Industrial Cooperatives.

The industrial cooperative is also an unpopular organizational-legal form of legal entity in Russia due to personal liability of its participants, and the need for their labor participation in the affairs of the legal entity.

The state and municipal unitary enterprises (or simply “the unitary enterprises”) are legal entities, which may be founded only by a state[40]40
  In this case, both the Russian Federation and its subjects are considered as a state.


[Закрыть] or the municipalities. Their property is respectively in a state or municipal ownership. The unitary enterprises have special rights to such property (see below).

There are two types of unitary enterprises:

i) a state enterprise

A state enterprise has the economic management rights of the property assigned to it. Generally, the right to economic management grants the state enterprise with an opportunity to independently dispose of the movable property. For the disposal of real estate, the consent of the owner shall be obtained (state or municipality).

ii) a treasury enterprise

A treasury enterprise has the operational management rights of the property assigned to it. This means that a treasury enterprise must obtain the owner’s consent for the disposition of any property. The production made by the treasury enterprise is an exception (it can independently dispose of it, unless otherwise provided by the legal acts).

The legal capacity of unitary enterprises is limited to the purposes of the activities stated in their charters.

Unitary enterprises are created mainly for rendering services to the population in those spheres where the activities of individual entrepreneurs are inadmissible or impossible (for example, public transportation, the production of goods being important for the state and society, etc.).

5. The Non-profit Organizations

A minimum amount of charter capital for non-profit organizations is not established, except for those organizations whose charter provides for a possibility of exercising activities which may generate income. The minimum amount of the charter capital for this kind of legal entity is 10,000 rubles (Clause 5 of Article 50 of the CC of the RF). In any case, private institutions have no restrictions set by the law on the size of the charter capital.

i) A consumer cooperative is a membership-based, voluntary association of citizens and legal entities, aimed at satisfying their material and other needs, being carried out by way of assembling their share contributions.

ii) A public organization is a voluntary association of citizens, who have united in the order stipulated by law on the basis of common interests, for the purposes of satisfying spiritual or other non-material needs, representing and protecting common interests and to achieve other purposes, which are not contradictory to the law.

iii) A public movement is a public association consisting of participants who are pursuing social, political and other socially useful purposes, supported by the participants of the public movement.

iv) An association (union) is an association of legal entities and/or citizens based on voluntary or, in the cases established by the law, on obligatory membership, and are created to represent and protect the common interests, including professional interests, to achieve socially useful purposes, as well as other purposes which are not contradictory with the law, and are of a non-commercial nature. Non-commercial partnerships are also referred to as associations (unions).

v) A fellowship of real estate owners is a voluntary association of real estate owners, created by them for the purposes of joint ownership, use, and within the limits set by law, disposal of the property, which by virtue of the law are under their common property or in common use, as well as the achievement of other goals which are not contradictory with the law.

vi) The Cossack communities are an association of citizens, entered in the state register of the Cossack societies in the Russian Federation, created to preserve a traditional way of life, and manage the culture of the Russian Cossacks, as well as for other purposes stipulated by law, with obligations of carrying out state or other services, as undertaken in accordance with the law.

vii) The communities of Aboriginal Smaller Peoples of the Russian Federation are voluntary associations of the citizens belonging to the Aboriginal Smaller Peoples of the Russian Federation, and are united by kinship and/or territorial and neighborhood principles, aiming at the protection of the primordial habitat, preservation and development of the traditional way of life, housekeeping, crafts and culture.

viii) The Chambers of Advocates are non-profit organizations based on obligatory membership, and are created in the form of the Chamber of Advocates of the Subject of the Russian Federation, or the Chamber of Advocates of the Russian Federation Federal, for the realization of the purposes provided by the legislation on advocacy.

ix) The advocacy formations, being legal entities[41]41
  In the section on corporations, we consider advocacy formations that are legal entities.


[Закрыть] are non-profit organizations, created in accordance with the advocacy legislation aiming at the implementation of advocacy by the participants.

i) A fund is a unitary non-profit and non-membership organization, founded by the citizens and/or legal entities, on the basis of voluntary property contributions and pursuing charitable, cultural, educational, or other social or socially useful purposes.

ii) An institution is a unitary non-profit organization created by the owners for the implementation of managerial, socio-cultural, or other functions of a non-commercial nature. A founder is the owner of the property of an established institution. It gets the right to operational management of the property assigned by an owner to an institution, and is acquired by an institution on other bases in accordance with the CC of the RF.

iii) An autonomous non-profit organization is a unitary non-profit and non-membership organization, established on the basis of property contributions of citizens and/or legal entities, aiming at the rendering of services in the spheres of education, health care, culture, science, and other non-commercial activities.

iv) A religious organization is a voluntary association of the citizens of the Russian Federation, permanently and lawfully residing in the territory of the Russian Federation, or other persons, formed by them, aimed at joint confession and spreading of the faith, and registered as a legal entity in accordance with the law (a local religious organization), unions of these organizations (the centralized religious organization), as well as an organization, created by the given union and/or managing or coordinating body of the union. This is in accordance with the law on freedom of conscience and religious associations, and these organizations are aiming at the joint confession and spreading of the faith.

v) The Public-Legal Companies

The public-legal companies are an organizational-legal form of legal entities, which are new to Russia, that appeared in the CC of the RF in 2014. However, currently neither the CC of the RF, nor other laws, contain any norms establishing the legal status of these organizations. This shortcoming is expected to be corrected soon.

vi) The State Corporations

The possibility to create state corporations is provided in Article 3 of the Federal Law No. 99-FZ dated May 5, 2014. State corporations are created for the purposes of the implementation of social, managerial or other socially useful functions. Each state corporation is created on the basis of a separate federal law that establishes features of the legal status thereof.

Currently the following state corporations are operating in Russia:

– Rosatom State Corporation of Atomic Energy;

– State Corporation for the Promotion of the Development, Production and Export of Hi-Tech Industrial Products “Rostec”;

– State Corporation “Bank for Development and Foreign Affairs (Vnesheconombank)”

vii) The State Companies.

The only state company currently operating in Russia is the State Company "Russian Highways.” It operates under ad hoc federal law. The legislation does not provide a possibility for the creation of new legal entities in the form of state companies.

Svetlana Popova[42]42
  Legal analyst, Consultant Plus; Lomonosov Moscow State University, LL. B. 2013.


[Закрыть]
Chapter 3 – Core Business Contracts

1. The Contract As a Basis for Creating Obligations

Under Clause 1 of Article 420 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, a contract shall be recognized as an agreement, concluded by two or more persons of the institution, upon modification or termination of civil rights and duties. The general provisions on obligations (Articles 307–419 of the CC of the RF) shall be applied towards the obligations, arising from the contract, unless otherwise provided in the provisions of the CC of the RF, governing individual types of contracts or in the general provisions on contracts set forth in the CC of the RF.

The contract is also a bilateral or multilateral transaction. Therefore, as a general rule, the provisions on transactions set forth in Chapter 9 of CC of RF are applicable to contractual relations. Nevertheless, two exceptions to this rule have been implemented as a result of the amendments to the CC of the RF, which have been in force since July 1, 2015.[43]43
  See Federal law No. 42-FZ, dated March 8, 2015, “On Amending Part One of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation,” // “ConsultantPlus” Legal Directory System


[Закрыть]

The first exception concerns the application of the provisions on the invalidity of contractual transactions, which are related to entrepreneurial activity undertaken by the parties. Thus, as a general rule, the party which accepted the performance of the business contract from the counterparty, and fully or partially failed to ensure reciprocal performance of that contract, cannot claim the invalidity of the contract. The second exception pertains to the application of general consequences of the invalidity of transactions within business contracts. The parties of such a contract, which is a voidable transaction, may agree on additional consequences of invalidity, other than those provided in Article 167 of the CC of the RF. Furthermore, such an agreement should be concluded after the declaration of the contract as invalid, should not affect the rights of third parties, and should not violate the public interest.

Consequently, the following provisions of the CC of the RF need to be taken into account upon conclusion of the contract:

– Subsection 1 of Section 3 of Part 1 of the CC of the RF (general provisions on obligations);

– Subsection 2 of Section 3 of Part 1 of the CC of the RF (general provisions on contracts);

– Part 2 of the CC of the RF (individual types of obligations);

– Chapter 9 of the CC of the RF (transactions) – with some exceptions to be discussed below.

Specific regulation of individual types of contracts can be found not only in the CC of the RF, but also in other laws and regulations (e.g. the Urban Planning Code of the RF).

The CC of the RF contains general provisions pertaining to every type of contract, and provisions regulating certain types of contracts (public contract, contract of adhesion, etc.), as well as provisions on individual types of contracts (purchase and sale contracts, rental agreements, etc.). The provisions on individual types of contracts cover the main rights and obligations of the parties, the rules of concluding a contract, formal requirements of a contract, etc.

Furthermore, the parties can conclude not only the types of contracts which are named directly in the CC of the RF, but also contracts which are not specified therein. The latter category can include contracts containing elements of several named contracts (mixed contracts), and special contracts, which do not contain elements of named contracts (unnamed contracts). Depending on the type of concluded contract, different principles can be distinguished with respect to the regulation of the contractual relationships of the parties.

Relationships under named contracts are defined by the parties, taking into consideration the rules on those contracts provided in the CC of the RF. The imperative norms governing the contract cannot be changed by the parties. When there are dispositive rules governing the contract, the parties can agree not to apply those provisions, or to establish different rules. The criteria for imperative norms have been identified in the Decision No. 16 of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of Arbitration of the RF, dated March 14, 2014.[44]44
  See Decision No. 16, dated March 14, 2014, of the Plenum of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the RF, "On the Freedom of Contract and Its Limits," // “ConsultantPlus” Legal Directory System.


[Закрыть]

The Decision No. 16 of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of Arbitration of the RF, dated March 14, 2014, "On the Freedom of Contracts and Its Limits," was the first decision to establish the presumption of the dispositive nature of the norms governing individual types of contracts. According to the Plenum of the Supreme Court of Arbitration of the RF, the legal norms governing the rights and obligations under the contract shall be considered to be imperative, if those include a clear prohibition on adding different clauses to the contract. The norm is also of an imperative nature, if it is necessary for the purposes of safeguarding special interests protected by law (interests of the weakest party of the contract, third parties, public interest, etc.), for avoiding a great disparity between the parties’ interests. In addition, the imperative nature of a legal norm can be implied from the nature of the legislative regulation pertaining to a certain type of contract. In other scenarios, the norm should be considered to be of a dispositive nature.

With respect to the relationship under mixed contracts, or contracts which have elements of a mixed contract, the rules governing these contracts apply in respective portions, unless the parties agreed otherwise, or the rules are implied based on the nature of the mixed contract.

As for unnamed contracts, the rules on individual types of contracts provided in the CC of the RF do not apply directly. However, if the parties do not set in the contract the rules governing a particular aspect of their relationship, then the provisions on the individual types of contracts of the CC of the RF may apply by analogy (analogy of the law – Clause 1 of Article 6 of the CC of the RF).

In any of the aforementioned scenarios, the parties have the right to agree that the individual terms of the contract shall be determined by standard terms developed for contracts pertaining to the respective type, and published in the press (Article 427 of the CC of the RF). In the event that the contract does not contain a reference to such standard terms, they can be applied to the relationship of the parties as customs of trade.

The general stipulations of contract law in the CC of the RF includes provisions applicable to certain types of contracts: public contract, contract of adhesion, preliminary contract, framework agreement, option agreement, subscription contract, and the contract for the benefit of third persons.

As a general rule, a contract is concluded by the means of one party sending an offer, and the other party accepting it. The contract shall be considered to be concluded from the moment of receiving the acceptance by the party which has sent the offer.

Furthermore, a contract shall be considered to be concluded, if an agreement in the required form has been reached between the parties on all of the essential terms of the contract (Article 432 of the CC of the RF). The essential terms of the contract are:

– the subject matter of the contract;

– the terms that are named in a statute, or in other legal acts, as essential or necessary for contracts of the given type;

– the terms with respect to which, by declaration of one of the parties, an agreement must be reached.

If any of the essential terms of the contract have not been agreed on, the contract, as a general rule, shall be deemed to be unconcluded. In this respect, the following factors shall be considered:

– the party cannot claim that the contract is unconcluded if: first, that the party has accepted the performance of the contract or otherwise acknowledged the validity of the contract; second, considering the particular circumstances, such a claim will contradict the good faith principle (Clause 3 of Article 432 of the CC of the RF);

– the contract shall not be considered as unconcluded, if the essential term, with respect to which an agreement has not been reached, can be covered by the general rules on obligations, or by a framework agreement. The application thereof shall not, however, be in conflict with the nature of the specific contract.[45]45
  See Informative letter No. 165 of the Presidium of the Supreme Court of Arbitration of the RF, dated February 25, 2014, “On the Overview of the Judicial Practice Regarding the Disputes Related to the Declaration of Contracts as Unconcluded,” // “ConsultantPlus” Legal Directory System


[Закрыть]

Some contracts require state registration. Such registration is required, for example, for real estate rental agreements concluded for a period of not less than one year (Clause 2 of Article 609 of the CC of the RF), and for commercial concession contracts (Clause 2 Article 1028 of the CC of the RF). For third parties, the contracts which by law require state registration, shall be considered concluded from the moment of such registration.[46]46
  The finding that the contract, which has not undergone state registration, shall be deemed concluded for third parties and not for the parties of the contract, has been determined in Federal law No. 42-FZ, dated March 8, 2015, “On Amending Part One of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation,” which came into effect on July 1, 2015.


[Закрыть] Such a contract creates obligations for its parties, and cannot be declared by the courts as an unconcluded contract.

In its informative letter No. 165, dated February 25, 2014, the Presidium of the Supreme Court of Arbitration of the RF noted that the contract, which has not been duly registered, does not bear all of the consequences of the contract. Such a contract does not bear consequences which can affect the rights and interests of third parties who are unaware of the conclusion and the content of that contract. On the other hand, all legal consequences arise for the parties of the contract, from the moment an agreement has been reached in relation to all the essential terms. The full range of the consequences of the contract are enforced upon its state registration.[47]47
  See Clauses 2 and 3 of the Informative letter No. 165 of the Presidium of the Supreme Court of Arbitration of the RF, dated February 2, 2014, “On the Overview of the Judicial Practice Regarding Disputes Related to the Declaration of Contracts as Unconcluded,” // “ConsultantPlus” Legal Directory System


[Закрыть] Such an interpretation of the provision has previously been conveyed by Decision No. 73 of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of Arbitration of the RF, dated November 17, 2011.[48]48
  See Clause 14 of the Decision No. 73 of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of Arbitration of the RF, dated November 17, 2011, "On Some Issues of the Application of the Rules on Rent Contracts, Provided in the Civil Code of the Russian Federation,” // “ConsultantPlus” Legal Directory System


[Закрыть]